Just got done viewing all the introductions for our class and I was blown away at each person’s creativity. Although some of the same tools were used to do the introductions, each had their own unique way of presenting the information about their classmates. It’s amazing to think how many different delivery options are available on the Web. We are currently addressing social media in our school and I’m of the mindset that we should have the goal of getting our students to a place where we don’t need to filter content or sites. When we talk about tools and blocking certain ones like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, I think we’re missing the point. We need to refocus. The real tool is the Web. Sites and apps like Facebook, Twitter and YouTube are merely ways of using “The Tool.” I think it’s too narrow minded to think in terms of individual Web 2.0 apps. We need to think of the Web as a whole and present it to our students that way. Yes, it might be something that will take some time to get to. We may need to start out more restrictive, but we should never lose site of our goal– to give students access to “The Tool” so they can learn to apply the appropriate apps, sites, etc. and if one doesn’t work, they should know that there are many others that can fulfill the same need. I think our introductions prove that there are so many options to do an introduction.
When I think of my own children, I want to know that they will behave responsibly, that they will be able to leverage the Web for school and later for work, and the only way I can do that is to give them access to “The Tool.” Will they need my guidance and mentoring? Absolutely! Will they make mistakes and need to be corrected. I expect so. Will that stop me from teaching them. No!
dean